
Judging Panel
Judges' Comments:
The finalists were all of a very high standard, with an in depth level of research and rigour. However the submissions that showed exceptional skill, innovation, maturity embracing sustainability at a very responsible level, were the 1st prize winners from the Textile Design and Industrial Design categories.
Both projects displayed the depth and breadth of the design profession; Textile Design with the capacity to provoke an emotional response as a work of art produced a thoughtful collection,Industrial Design to solve real medical needs in an innovative and technically competent manner.
The judges believed that these projects earned the right to be nominated as equal winners and accordingly the DIA along with their partnering sponsors accepted the recommendation. Both entries touched the judges’ intellect and heart, with both students showing leadership in their chosen field.
Prize to each winner $1,000 cash sponsored by Artichoke Magazine and the DIA.
Judging Panel
Meryl Hare, FDIA – Convener
Pia Francesca, FDIA
Kate St James, FDIA

Vanessa Masson
Curtin University, WA
Prize
Judges’ Comments on the Winner’s Submission
The judges were impressed by the consistency of this students work; the excellent conceptual drawings. Clarity of graphics were standout and the “Incubate” entry was an innovative approach to decrepit city areas and youth involvement. The judges would have liked to have seen more attention to sustainability issues.

Second Prize
Sarah Tite
Queensland University of Technology, QLD

Commendation
Frances Gaffney
Swinburne University of Technology, VIC
Judging Panel
Meryl Hare, FDIA – Convener
Pia Francesca, FDIA
Kate St James, FDIA

Kate Pieters
RMIT University, VIC
Prize
Judges’ Comments on the Winner’s Submission
The judges’ decision was unanimous – outstanding entry “Convent” addressed sustainability, well crafted, imaginative, good presentation, creative. The judges were impressed by this student’s progression and the way the work has evolved. Good attention to brief.

Second Prize
Bianca Castellan
CATC Design School, NSW
Judging Panel
Louise Eastwood, FDIA – Convener
Jacqueline Hill, MDIA
Overview of Submissions
The winner was a clear standout across all judging criteria. While the entries were aesthetically pleasing, polished and well executed there was a lack of true conceptual thinking underpinning the results with the exception of the winner. Within the graphics design process, sustainability is driven from an understanding of multi functionality ‘less can be more’ and the entrants in some cases designed for designs sake. None of the other entries came close to the winner and did not warrant prize recognition.

Amy Melksham
Design College Australia, QLD
Prize
Judges’ Comments on the Winner’s Submission
There was a genuine authenticity and honesty in the work. The judges were impressed by the diversity of the creative solutions. The inclusion of all the working process indicated true creative thinking, delivering on the stated promise of “giving my all”.
(Including Industrial Design, Furniture Design and Jewellery Design)
Judging Panel
Clive Solari, FDIA – Convener
David Francis, FDIA
Gary Bortz, FDIA
Sandra Berzins, Studio Manager at Folk
Overview of Submissions
Overall the entries were good but nothing blew the judges away. Most designers had one project displayed which was noticeable weaker than the others. The winner was chosen partly because of their constant level of good design across all three projects.

Mark Wu
Auckland University of Technology ( receives a 3D Touch printer sponsored by 3D Systems)
Prize
Judges’ Comments on the Winner’s Submission
The winner’s work demonstrated an admirable design philosophy backed up by some mature intelligent design thinking across all three projects. It was clear from the work that extensive research had been done prior to any design tasks and this understanding led the way to good design solutions with a high level of detailing. The work was easy to understand and appreciate thanks to clear, well laid out presentation boards.

Second Prize (Industrial Design)
Dean Benstead
RMIT University, VIC

Third Prize (Industrial Design)
Patryk Koca
University of Technology Sydney, NSW

Commendation (Jewellery Design)
Ian Koker
Design Centre Enmore, NSW
Judging Panel
Philippa Wilkinson, MDIA – Convener
Karinna Gobbo, FDIA
Overview of Submissions
Sustainability was integrated well into the concepts. The judges saw a mixed use of applications and materials, and noted a lot of thought behind the work. The judges also commented, “remember the audience”.

Sarah Strickland
RMIT University, VIC
Prize
Judges’ Comments on the Winner’s Submission
Strong clarity and confidence, resolution of ideas well executed.

Second Prize
Greta Menzies
Massey University, NZ
Prize
Judging Panel
Philippa Wilkinson, MDIA – Convener
Karinna Gobbo, FDIA
Overview of Submissions
Good formulation of designs ready to be developed for potential commercial use. Some key pieces really stood out for the catwalk. Further research required for the use of materials for their application. Sometimes tenuous links between ideas and product.

Carlie Waterman
Sydney Institute, NSW
Prize
Judges’ Comments on the Winner’s Submission
Strong sense of style and direction. A ready to were collection; all aspects were well developed.

Second Prize
Marianna Tigani
QUT Creative Industries, QLD
Prize
Endorsed by
Media Partner
Supported by
Prize Sponsors
Gillian MacMillan
MDIA
Lorna Wallace
MDIA
Gordon Stuart
FDIA
Natalie Wright
FDIA
Eminè Mehmet
FDIA
Christopher Elliott
MDIA
Diana Henshall
FDIA
Frank Stillitano
MDIA
Barbara Bromley
MDIA
Cherel Millist
MDIA
Suzette Jackson
MDIA
Gary Bortz
FDIA
Caecilia Potter
MDIA
Aileen Angus
MDIA
Lisa Hunt
MDIA
Jurgen Schirmacher
MDIA
Robyn Wood
MDIA
The national newsletter of the DIA, currently produced quarterly and distributed FREE to all DIA members. View current issue
‘ “It looks good” is the worst feedback you can get.’
Whitney Hess